neo-neocon: Has Obama done any irreversible damage so far?
One of the most astute of the Psych-bloggers* has opined that Obama has done irreversible damage to the country.
Has Obama done any irreversible damage so far?I saw the above question in the comments section of a post at Althouse, and I believe the answer is “yes.”
But the reason I say this may surprise you. It’s not any one action or decision, or even several. It’s not even whether health care reform, if passed, can be reversed. It’s not the terrible precedent set by using reconciliation for a bill that is unpopular, not a budget or deficit measure, and has no bipartisan support. It’s not even Obama’s foreign policy, that insults our allies and emboldens dictators and fails to scare Iran in the least, although all of the above matter very much and they are all very bad.
via neo-neocon: Has Obama done any irreversible damage so far?
Read The Rest at the link above.
I’m almost in total agreement with neo-neocon. Obama and his minions on the left are pushing an agenda, the total agenda, not just Obamacare or the deficit or the kowtowing to radical leaders such as the King of Saudi Arabia or even the Mad Mullah’s of Iran. But the entire way that government functions.
The buyer’s remorse spreading throughout the voting public is due to the realization that they have been sold a blivet** and are resentful. Obama’s numbers are falling faster than lined up dominoes. I think however, that the Republic is stronger than even the most radical of leftists believes and this in turn will put the right to the wrong’s of this administration. It’s the pain that we will all have to shoulder to get there that worry’s me.
* See “The Psych-Bloggers” blogroll at the left
**Blivet: 10 pounds of crap stuffed in a 5 pound bag
You also might enjoy these posts (selected just for you by Conservative Elves):
Comments
I think the whole thing was a set-up. Obama was bank rolled by people with very far left views. He was instilled to “change” the country.
I think this is why he is pushing health care at any costs. I think he genuinely means it when he says for Congressmen to vote for it even if it means their jobs. He is pushing an agenda, not working for the interests of the Democratic party.
I believe that if he loses Congress we will see a significant up tick in executive orders. He knows that some will be overturned in court. Some though will survive and the ones that are challenged in court will take years to resolve.
If he does not lose Congress the Dems will take this as a sign that they have a mandate.
Bottom line, we ain’t seen nothing yet.