<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Conservative Dilemma in America: Turf Wars, Fusionism or Alliance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gmsplace.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:28:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Amagi</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294&#038;cpage=1#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Amagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>What an image! Thanks GM. Progressivism  may be a misnomer, but at least it was their own invention, and not a stolen and distorted re-definition of an old term like &quot;liberalism.&quot; But it is interesting that many so-called Progressives today are Luddites economically and regressive statists when it comes to individual and economic liberty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an image! Thanks GM. Progressivism  may be a misnomer, but at least it was their own invention, and not a stolen and distorted re-definition of an old term like &#8220;liberalism.&#8221; But it is interesting that many so-called Progressives today are Luddites economically and regressive statists when it comes to individual and economic liberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294&#038;cpage=1#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>Good post Mark, but I must say that there is absolutely nothing progressive about Progressive Statism.  That said, conservatives &amp; libertarians must join together and stop this eating of our own.  I&#039;m too much reminded of Goya&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Devouring_His_Son&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Saturn Devouring His Son&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

If we do not hang together, we will surly hang separately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Mark, but I must say that there is absolutely nothing progressive about Progressive Statism.  That said, conservatives &amp; libertarians must join together and stop this eating of our own.  I&#8217;m too much reminded of Goya&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Devouring_His_Son" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Saturn Devouring His Son&#8221;</a></p>
<p>If we do not hang together, we will surly hang separately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Amagi</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294&#038;cpage=1#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Amagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>I read your &quot;Conservative-Libertarian Schism.&quot; Excellent post! You&#039;ve made a great case for Fusionism, which is possible for some of us. It&#039;s why, when asked about my own  political preferences and philosophy, I respond &quot;conservative libertarian.&quot; 
I think you ought to post it again, as the time is certainly ripe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your &#8220;Conservative-Libertarian Schism.&#8221; Excellent post! You&#8217;ve made a great case for Fusionism, which is possible for some of us. It&#8217;s why, when asked about my own  political preferences and philosophy, I respond &#8220;conservative libertarian.&#8221;<br />
I think you ought to post it again, as the time is certainly ripe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Amagi</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294&#038;cpage=1#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Amagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment and citation, Francis. I look forward to reading what you&#039;ve written. I did glance at it and as you can see from my posts, I too have been influenced by Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams, and who cares whether they&#039;re Neo, Paleo, or Libertarian (or a combination of all three). I&#039;m definitely not a purist in that respect. 
The only thing I might disagree with is that I do think that conservatism does need representatives of traditional conservatism, like Kirk, if it is to survive as a viable political movement, although it is debatable whether or not his fellow travelers will show up for the cause if  they don&#039;t win out. Many on the far right opt out for third parties when push comes to shove, and admittedly, I&#039;ve done so myself in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment and citation, Francis. I look forward to reading what you&#8217;ve written. I did glance at it and as you can see from my posts, I too have been influenced by Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams, and who cares whether they&#8217;re Neo, Paleo, or Libertarian (or a combination of all three). I&#8217;m definitely not a purist in that respect.<br />
The only thing I might disagree with is that I do think that conservatism does need representatives of traditional conservatism, like Kirk, if it is to survive as a viable political movement, although it is debatable whether or not his fellow travelers will show up for the cause if  they don&#8217;t win out. Many on the far right opt out for third parties when push comes to shove, and admittedly, I&#8217;ve done so myself in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis W. Porretto</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294&#038;cpage=1#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis W. Porretto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsplace.com/?p=2294#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>Russell Kirk was a fine example of the sort of conservative &quot;who never thinks anything should be done for the first time.&quot; He spent quite a bit of his time and energy slagging off classical liberals such as Von Mises and libertarians such as frank Chodorov - and to what ultimate end? A backwater in which conservatives have nothing to say but &quot;Stop!&quot;

Apropos of your larger topic, ou might be interested in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eternityroad.info/index.php/weblog/single/the_conservative_libertarian_schism/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;this exposition on a modern synthesis of conservative and libertarian thought.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell Kirk was a fine example of the sort of conservative &#8220;who never thinks anything should be done for the first time.&#8221; He spent quite a bit of his time and energy slagging off classical liberals such as Von Mises and libertarians such as frank Chodorov &#8211; and to what ultimate end? A backwater in which conservatives have nothing to say but &#8220;Stop!&#8221;</p>
<p>Apropos of your larger topic, ou might be interested in <a href="http://www.eternityroad.info/index.php/weblog/single/the_conservative_libertarian_schism/" rel="nofollow"><b>this exposition on a modern synthesis of conservative and libertarian thought.</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
